Thursday, September 27, 2007

Mercenaries: Aegis, Tim Spicer, and Sandline

First up on the mercenary chopping block is Tim Spicer's Aegis. First I will give some info on the shaky past of Tim Spicer and what was once Sandline. I found a really decent summary on another website and the following quotation has been taken directly from this article.

"Analysts like Peter Singer, author of Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and a fellow at the Brookings Institution, a liberal think tank in Washington, D.C., say that the news took them by surprise. " It's like a blast from the past, like I took a leap back into the time-machine to the late '90s," said Singer. "To be honest, though, I am doubtful that the folks awarding the contract had any sense of Spicer's spicier history."

But not everyone agrees with this assessment of Spicer's work. In Sierra Leone, Spicer's efforts have been heralded by the private military industry as the "work of angels." In 1998, Sandline was contracted to sell 30 tons of arms to the forces of Ahmad Tejan Kabbah, the former leader of Sierra Leone, in contravention of a UN arms embargo but in apparent cooperation with Craig Murray, a junior staffer at the British Foreign Office.

Doug Brooks, the president of International Peace Operations Association (IPOA), a non-profit advocacy group for private military companies including Sandline, says the company's assistance in Sierra Leone saved the lives of thousands of civilians. "Sandline was remarkably effective," Brooks said. "Their goal of restoring the democratically elected government was achieved. They maintained a low profile but played a critical role in the success."

Nonetheless, Sandline's Sierra Leone project provoked a furor and multiple government investigations in Britain when it was discovered that the contract violated the United Nations embargo on providing arms to either side in the military conflict. Spicer maintains that he was unaware that the scheme was illegal and the government eventually agreed to draw up new rules on arms trafficking and the conduct of private military companies in Britain.

Spicer's work in Papua New Guinea, another public relations fiasco, was not even a military success. The eastern half of the South Pacific island of New Guinea, Papua New Guinea (PNG), was a British and German colony and then an Australian protectorate until 1975. That year, both PNG and the outlying island of Bougainville, some 500 miles northeast of the capital, Port Moresby, declared independence. PNG quickly took over Bougainville, where an Australian company, CRA (now part of Rio Tinto, the world's largest mining company), had begun to mine copper in 1972.

In 1989, local landowners shut down the Bougainville copper mine to protest the environmental destruction it caused and to demand independence. In February 1997, the PNG government, which had received about 44 percent of its revenue from the mine, paid Sandline International $36 million to rout the Bougainvilleans.

The very next month, PNG Prime Minister Julius Chan sacked the military commander, Brigadier General Jerry Singarok, for denouncing the contract with Sandline and arguing that the money would be better spent on his own troops, who were desperately underpaid and ill-equipped. Riots ensued after soldiers loyal to Singarok led protests that included at least 2,000 civilians. The soldiers arrested and deported a number of the Sandline contractors.

Less than a month later, dressed in crumpled jeans, Spicer was led into a Papua New Guinea court. His suitcase, bulging with $400,000 in cash, was produced as evidence of his contract with the disgraced government. At the hearings, Spicer revealed that one aspect of the project (code-named "Operation Oyster") was to wage a psychological campaign against the Bougainvilleans with the help of Russian style attack helicopters (see Give War a Chance: the Life and Times of Tim Spicer for more on Sandline).

Spicer's lawyers worked overtime to get the charges reduced and eventually dismissed but Chan was forced to resign from his job."

This is the background of Tim. Aegis is not just in Iraq, but does business in many other countries. The following has been borrowed from this site.

"In March this year a group of mercenaries was arrested in Zimbabwe, allegedly attempting to buy arms to oust the dictator of Equatorial Guinea, Teodoro Obiam Nguema. The accused gave a different story, claiming they were en route to the Eastern Congo, to provide "security" for diamond mines.

Behind this botched enterprise is Simon Mann, a British ex-SAS officer who helped set up the notorious Executive Outcomes, which - until it was outlawed by South Africa in 1999 - was behind several takeovers of mineral-rich areas in West Africa. A close associate of Mann's at the time was Tony Buckingham, another Briton whose company Branch Energy set up Diamondworks. This used the services of Sandline, another much-criticised armed band which Mann set up with fellow ex-SAS officer, Colonel Tim Spicer.

Now Spicer has secured an extremely lucrative contract to supply "security" to US companies in Iraq. It's not the first such contract: according to the Observer newspaper (June 5th 2004), last summer the British Department for International Development (DFID itself signed a deal with Meteoric Tactical Solutions (MTS) to safeguard its own staff in the conflict-ravaged country. Two of MTS's owners were among those arrested in Zimbabwe three months ago, accused of the attempted coup against Nguema."

Please do your part to speak out against the use of mercenaries, not only in Iraq, but worldwide. The last thing that we should have to worry about is private corporate armies with no allegiance, no true country, and no real accountability. It is disturbing that we hear reports of "security contractors" working traffic for VIPs and firing upon cars with families in them for failure to come to a complete stop or reports of mercenaries firing into civilians, using them as target practice.

"People cannot tell the difference between the mercenaries and soldiers because they all wore the same uniform, had the same weapons, spoke the same language and came from the same place."
-- Agim Hasku

Another Interuption -- MoveOn.org ad again

I wanted to interrupt one more time to speak about the resolution that was condemning the ad by MoveOn.org and praising General Patraeus's patriotism. Bill Clinton hit it right on the head in his interview on Anderson Cooper 360. This was a attempt at feigned outrage for an ad in an attempt to switch attention off of the three different measures fillibustered out that same by the Republicans that would have brought end to this conflict in Iraq.

I further want to express my anger at the democratic people in congress that fell for this move. When are they going to learn that 70% of the country is behind them and stop allowing the Reps to bring their patriotism into question. I did in fact call my Democratic Congresswoman Giffords and let her know how upset that I was that she voted for this nonsense. I suggest that you all do the same. You can visit the clerk's website and view how your congressional leaders voted on this.

Let them know that we are tired of being pushed around and that they have the support of the people. Boost your leaders' confidence by letting them know that a pull-out in Iraq is supported by the majority and that we will not question their patriotism by them doing so. Peace.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

A Few Quick Things

Before I talk more about mercenaries, I want to take a quick break to talk about a few news items that have been pissing me off. These items are the MoveOn.org add criticizing Gen. Patraeus and the recent comments of Bill O'Reilly on african american culture.

Let's start off first with the whole moveon.org fiasco. MoveOn, which I am a member, published a full page add giving much needed and fair criticism to the report given to congress by General Patraeus. It asked the question of whether or not he is indeed trustworthy. This is a decent question, considering that the progress report given to the congress was full of half-truths and misleading graphs.

As it stands now, you can't turn on the fucking TV or radio without someone leading the condemning parade against an ad asking you to more closely examine the facts. This movement of course started on Rupert's shithole, FoxNews, and progressed to the rest of the media like wildfire. If the "liberal" media is really so "liberal", then why is this such a large story. The story that you didn't hear nearly as much about was the one that happened the same day that Patraeus gave his report.

This story that happened that same day, involved Admiral Fallon. Admiral Fallon is Patraeus's boss. He is the head of CENTCOM. His comments about the direction that Patraeus was taking his recommendations said that he considered him to be "an ass-kissing little chickenshit" and added that "I hate people like that." Certainly reports of General Patraeus's own boss reflecting views that he may have already betrayed us for his own interests would be larger news than a liberal organization that asked people to take a closer look? Nope. Go fuck yourself right wing media, and you too General Patraeus.

As for the other story. Many people are beginning to speak out about comments made by O'Reilly that were a backhanded compliment to the african-american community. The actual quote by Bill O'Reilly is as follows:

Discussing his recent dinner with Rev. Al Sharpton at the Harlem restaurant Sylvia's, Bill O'Reilly reported that he "couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship." O'Reilly added: "There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea.' "

I hate Mr. O'Reilly. I hate his views. I hate FOX. I hate Rupert Murdoch. This being said, do not think that I am only supporting him because I am on his side; I am not. People are now calling for him to be fired from CBS radio for his racial comments, using the excuse of the precedent set by the firing of Don Imus. I don't think that Imus should have been fired, I don't think that Opie and Anthony should have been suspended, and I don't think that Bill O'Rielly should be fired either. I may not only disagree with his views (I hate them) but I will also die for his right to express them. Being anti-censorship means not fucking listening to his show if you don't like what he says. Nobody should be fired for expressing their views if their whole job is based on expressing their views. Fuck Censorship!

"Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself."
-- Potter Stewart

---I urge everyone to join MoveOn.org and donate if possible.---

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Mercenaries: A Growth Industry

"For all the gold and silver stolen and shipped to Spain did not make the Spanish people richer. It gave their kings an edge in the balance of power for a time, a chance to hire more mercenary soldiers for their wars. They ended up losing those wars anyway, and all that was left was a deadly inflation, a starving population, the rich richer, the poor poorer, and a ruined peasant class."
Hans Konig


Shown in the above picture is one US soldier accompanied by four hired mercenaries. Now, before I go any further on a rant about mercenaries, let me get a few things cleared up. Some people have been sued over the past couple of years for calling these "security contractors" mercenaries.

Meriam Webster dictionary defines mercenary as
–adjective
1.working or acting merely for money or other reward; venal.
2.hired to serve in a foreign army, guerrilla organization, etc.
–noun
3.a professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army.
4.any hireling.

This being said, the forces in Iraq under the euphemism of "security contractor" are most definetly mercenary forces. This is a long and complicated subject, so I will be breaking it down into several posts for the sake of an easier read. There is also some good info on current private military companies (PMC) on wikipedia under mercenary. In this section I will cover the basics.

There are many mercenary companies working for us abroad, the most visable being over in Iraq. I have read estimates that place numbers as being as much as 120,000 privately owned soldiers running security on the ground over there. The pay for these soldiers ranges between $500 a day to as much as $4000 a day. They also reported recieve nearly 100 days off a year.

The main companies that I will cover in these articles are Blackwater and Aegis. They hire the "best of the best" from around the world. Forces made of Chilean commandos, African aparheid soldiers, former Navy Seal commandos, Gurkas from Nepal, and several other elite forces from across the globe. They own their own private helicopters and APCs as well as unmanned recon drones.

These are private armies for profit with sketchy makeups, sketchy backgrounds, and zero accountability and oversight for their actions. They are making the large corporations and defence contractors further dependent on maintaining a constant state of war. There can be no peace when people with lots of money are invested in maintaining a state of war and are not afraid to lobby to hardliners and extremists to keep business good.

Raenette Taljaard, a member of the South African Parliament,
describes the ubiquitous reach of this "booming cottage industry" of private security companies:
"In addition to becoming an integral part of the machinery of war, they are emerging as cogs in the infrastructure of peace. US-allied military officials and civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan are quickly becoming familiar with the 'brand services' provided by companies."

Is war something that we should begin to establish brand familiarity with corporations? Not to mention that when you are running a business for profit, the lives of those that you hire for your mercenaries do not weigh as heavily as the bottom line.

One security company, the Steele Foundation, recently turned down an $18 million contract for a corporation that wanted a security force deployed within only a few days; Steele said it simply could not find enough qualified guards so quickly. Another company promptly jumped at the contract. ''They just throw bodies at it,'' said Kenn Kurtz, Steele's chief executive officer.

The current mercenary companies have, over the span of the war, increased their numbers so exponentially that they rival the professional militaries of many countries. How long before someone with enough money decides he wants his own country and takes it?

And how onminous is it that the war drums are already sounding for military action against Iran. A use of force agreement (euphemism for declaring war without having to actually declare war) against Iran was introduced today into congress by Arizona's very own John Kyl as well as that fucking turncoat Lieberman. Luckily they were called on it for what it was and got owned right there on the senate floor. If we were to have conflict with Iran with the current state of the military, I could guarantee you would be seeing even more mercenaries being employed by the US.

Welcome to corporate armies of America. Would you like your war supersized? Would you like fucking fries with that? Thank you, drive through.

Politics with Others' Lives






























Once again, this administration and its legislative minority cult of followers has found it important to play politics with other people's lives. I found it disgusting enough when top republicans admitted to not voting for withdraw from the war in Iraq in order to pander to their base until after the primaries. This, however, sets a new low for the party.

The SCHIP program that gives health insurance to millions of uninsured low-income children across the nation is up for renewal. Bush has expressed his views that if the planned expansion passed the congress, he will veto it. This being said, it probably won't even come to that point. This MVF (Most Likely to Fillibuster) Republican minority will probably even block it from coming to an up or down vote. They will do this because their leader has expressed his views and they will follow blindly, knowing that we won't have the 60 votes needed to bring it to vote.

Millions of children are going to be without insurance and will likely die because the decider has spoken. If only there were concrete ways to tally the hundreds of thousands of lives that have been lost to this toddler of an administration or the millions displaced and economically crippled.

One question mister president, mister conservative congressman, mister lobbyist, or mister defense contractor; "How the FUCK do you sleep at night?" All that dirty money must make for a hell of a pillow.

Post to you later. Read a book, read the news, speak out, write the people responsible, and maintain constant vigilance.